FACULTY SENATE PROGRAM REVIEW REPORTS
DATA PAGE:
# of Undergraduate Degrees granted (1st, 2nd, total)
# of minors granted
% graduates going on to post-graduate programs
% graduates employed
Senior Test Scores:
Test Name
% scoring above the 50th percentile
% scoring above the 80th percentile
Portfolio Information (% distribution)
Critical Thinking
Interdisciplinary Thinking
GSQ DATA:
How satisfied were you with this major? (1-Very Dissatisfied, 2-Dissatisfied, 3-Satisfied, 4-Very Satisfied)
How satisfied were you with the accessibility of instructors in your major? (1-Very Dissatisfied, 2- Dissatisfied, 3-Satisfied, 4-Very Satisfied)
How satisfied were you with the academic advising by faculty advisor in your major? (1-Very Dissatisfied, 2-Dissatisfied, 3-Satisfied, 4-Very Satisfied)
How satisfied were you with the opportunities to interact with faculty outside of class? (1-Very Dissatisfied, 2-Dissatisfied, 3-Satisfied, 4-Very Satisfied)
How many faculty members do you know well enough to obtain a letter of recommendation? (None, One, Two, Three, More than Three)
How satisfied were you with the availability of courses offered in your major? (1-Very Dissatisfied, 2-Dissatisfied, 3-Satisfied, 4-Very Satisfied)
Student Time on Task: time spent studying each week
Faculty/Student FTE Ratio
Curricular Page:
Major:
Student Learning Outcomes Objectives for the major(s) (which must include outcomes related to critical thinking and writing)
Chart of how student learning outcomes are achieved through the program’s curriculum
Evidence that student learning outcomes are being met using internal and external assessments
To the above materials, please attach your executive summary of the department’s program review